Similarly, if he must permit something durante an emergency, he must clarify his reason for that particular case

Just as verso rabbi may not permit that which is forbidden, so must he be careful not onesto forbid that which is permitted. Therefore, if a rabbi must forbid something merely because of per question of law, because of per custom, or because of special circumstances, he must state his reason so as not onesto establish an erroneous precedent.

Nevertheless, it is forbidden for per city sicuro split into two congregations primarily because of per dispute over law or practice

Verso rabbi should be careful not to render an unusual or anomalous decision, unless he carefully explains the reasons for it. Therefore, any uncommon decision that depends on subtle or esoteric reasoning should not be publicized, lest it lead puro erroneous conclusions. It is for this reason that there are cases which are permitted only sopra the case of per scholar, and which may not be taught sicuro the ignorant.

When per rabbi renders verso decision con a case per which there are mai clear precedents, he must strive puro bring as many proofs as possible…

When a rabbi renders a decision in per question of law, the Torah recognizes it as binding. Therefore, when verso rabbi decides on per case and forbids something, it becomes intrinsically forbidden.

Since the initial decision renders the subject of a case intrinsically forbidden, it cannot be permitted even by a greater sage or by verso majority rule.

An erroneous decision cannot render a case intrinsically forbidden. Therefore, if per sweet pea on-line second rabbi is able to esibizione that the original decision is refuted by generally accepted authorities or codes, he may reverse the original decision.

Similarly, a decision that is retracted with good reason does not render a case intrinsically forbidden. Therefore, if a second rabbi is able puro determine that common practice traditionally opposes the initial ong authorities, he may convince the first rabbi esatto retract his decision and permit the case per question. Individual logic and judgment, however, are not considered sufficient reason for per rabbi onesto reverse even his own decision…

In order preciso prevent controversy, one should not present a case before a rabbi without informing him of any previous decisions associated with that particular case.

One rabbi can overturn the decision of another only if he can prove the initial decision esatto be erroneous

Although the Torah demands per insecable degree of uniformity in practice, it does recognize geographical differences. Therefore, different communities may follow varying opinions sopra minor questions of Torah law.

However, where there is mai geographical or similar justification for varied practices, such differences are liable to be associated with ideological divergences and are forbidden. Within verso solo community, the Torah requires per high degree of uniformity durante religious practice. Con mai case should it be made onesto appear that there is more than one Torah.

It is written, “You are children of God your Lord; you must not mutilate yourselves (lo tit-godedu)” (Deut. 14:1). Just as it is forbidden to mutilate one’s body, so is it prohibited onesto mutilate the body of Judaism by dividing it into factions. Preciso do so is to disaffirm the universal fatherhood of God and the unity of His Torah.

It is therefore forbidden for members of verso single congregation preciso form factions, each following a different practice or opinion. It is likewise forbidden for verso solo rabbinical capable sicuro issue a split decision.

However, where verso city has more than one congregation, or more than one rabbinical breviligne, the following of each one is counted as verso separate community, and each one may follow different practices.